The Income‑Tax Act, 2025, which comes into force from 1 April 2026, replaces the old Income‑tax Act, 1961. While the new law broadly preserves India’s treaty framework, it introduces procedural changes and new compliance requirements for claiming DTAA benefits, most notably replacing Form 10F with Form 41 for non‑residents.
With increased globalization, it is common for foreign individuals to serve as directors on the boards of Indian companies.
While such non-resident directors (NRDs) may not be physically present in India or actively involved in day-to-day operations, their association with an Indian entity creates important tax compliance obligations.
Two critical aspects of Indian tax compliance for such individuals are:
These obligations may appear similar and misunderstanding the distinction often leads to either unnecessary compliance or inadvertent non-compliance.
This article examines the legal framework and practical implications surrounding PAN and ITR obligations for non-resident directors.
Before analyzing compliance requirements, it is essential to determine the individual’s residential status under Section 6 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
For non-resident directors, the most common Indian-sourced income is:
Once such income arises, compliance obligations are triggered.
Section 262 Rule 158 establishes the legal requirement to obtain and use a Permanent Account Number (PAN) if
Rule 158 provides the procedural framework for implementing Section 262:
Further, under Section 397, PAN becomes crucial for avoiding higher withholding tax rates.
A non-resident director is required to obtain a PAN in the following situations:
PAN helps ensure TDS is applied at the correct rate (including treaty rates) instead of the higher default rate (20%).
To claim Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) benefits, PAN is typically required along with TRC and other declarations.
Indian companies usually require PAN for director onboarding and it facilitates TDS reporting and compliance under AIS and other filings.
Merely holding a PAN does not create a tax-filing obligation. A foreign director is obligated to file an ITR only if they meet any of certain criteria.
Section 263 of the Income-tax Act mandates filing of an ITR if:
A non-resident director may not need to file an ITR if:
Particulars | PAN | ITR Filing |
Nature | Identification number | Annual compliance requirement |
Purpose | Track financial transactions and taxes | Report income and compute tax liability |
Trigger | Income, transactions or TDS provisions | Income threshold or refund claim |
Mandatory for NRDs | Generally, yes if income earned | Depending on income level |
Impact of non-compliance | Higher TDS (20%), compliance issues | Penalties, interest, inability to claim refund |
If PAN is not furnished:
Although judicial precedents indicate that DTAA provisions may override Section 397, in practice:
To ensure smooth compliance, NRDs should consider:
Even if income is small:
The distinction between PAN and ITR obligations is fundamental for non-resident directors engaged with Indian companies. While PAN serves as a foundational identification and compliance tool, it is often essential to avoid higher tax deductions, whereas ITR filing depends on income thresholds, refund claims and overall tax position.
In practice, due to the interplay of withholding tax provisions, treaty benefits and administrative procedures, most non-resident directors end up requiring both PAN and ITR compliance. Early planning, proper documentation and coordination with Indian tax advisors can significantly reduce compliance risks and optimize tax outcomes.
Get in touch with UJA Global Advisory today for personalized guidance on PAN registration, ITR filing, treaty benefit claims and end-to-end tax compliance support, so you can focus on your role, while we handle the compliance.