Rule 138(14) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, read with its Annexure Sr. Nos. 4 & 5, states that goods covered under Chapter 71 viz., Natural or cultured pearls and precious or semi-precious stones; precious metals and metals clad with precious metal, Jewellery, goldsmiths’, and silversmiths’ articles, except those classified under HSN 7117 (Imitation Jewellery), are exempt from the mandatory requirement of generating an E-Way Bill.
Pursuant to the introduction of the E-Way Bill (EWB) for goods classified under Chapter 71, excluding HSN 7117 (Imitation Jewellery), in the state of Kerala for intra-state movement, the National Informatics Centre (NIC) has provided an option to generate EWBs for goods covered under Chapter 71 except 7117 under the category “EWB for Gold” on the EWB portal.
Various industry stakeholders have voluntarily been generating EWBs for goods under Chapter 71 due to the availability of this option in the EWB system. In this regard, it is clarified that while the system previously allowed EWB generation for goods under Chapter 71, this facility has now been withdrawn.
Accordingly, taxpayers and transporters engaged in the movement of goods under Chapter 71 (except HSN 7117) are advised that EWB generation is not required. However, it may be noted that for the intrastate movement of such goods within the state of Kerala, the generation of an EWB has been mandated vide Notification No.10/24-State Tax dated 27/12/24 issued by the state of Kerala. An advisory dated 27.01.2025 has already been issued in this regard.
Industry stakeholders are requested to take note of this clarification and ensure compliance with the applicable regulatory provisions.
Dear Stakeholders,
A new feature has been introduced in the E-Way Bill (EWB) system to facilitate the enrollment of unregistered dealers supplying goods, effective 11.02.2025. Under Notification No. 12/2024 dated 10 July 2024, Form ENR-03 has been introduced for the Enrollment of unregistered dealers.
Unregistered dealers engaged in the movement or transportation of goods can now generate e-Way Bills by enrolling themselves on the EWB portal and obtaining a unique Enrollment ID. This ID will serve as an alternative to the Supplier GSTIN or Recipient GSTIN for generating e-Way Bills.
a) As per the notification, an Unregistered Person (URP)can enrol using Form ENR-03.
b) The option is available under the “Registration”tab in the main menu of the EWB portal.
a) Upon selecting the option, the Enrollment screen will be displayed.
b) The applicant must select their Stateand enter their PAN details, which will be verified.
c)The type of Enrollment must be selected, and address details must be provided.
d)A mobile number must be entered, which will be verified via OTP.
a) The user must create a username, check its availability, and set a passwordbefore submitting the details.
b) Upon successful submission, a 15-character Enrollment IDwill be generated, and an acknowledgement will be displayed.
c)This Enrollment ID can be used for generating e-Way Bills in place of a GSTIN.
a) The enrolled URP can log in to the EWB portal using the registered credentials.
b) By selecting the ‘Generate New’option, the Enrollment ID will be auto-populated as the Supplier/Recipient.
c) Other relevant details must be entered before proceeding with e-Way Bill generation.
For further assistance or queries related to this update, taxpayers may contact the GST Helpdesk or refer to the detailed User Guide attached.
https://tutorial.gst.gov.in/downloads/news/user_manual_for_enr_03_final.pdf
This advisory is issued for the information and compliance of all stakeholders.
Based on the recommendations of the GST Council in its 55th meeting held on 21st December 2024, at Jaisalmer, in the exercise of the powers conferred under section 168(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Board hereby clarifies the following issues through this circular for the purpose of uniformity in their implementation:
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), the Central Government, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby waives the amount of late fee referred to in section 47 of the said Act in respect of the return to be furnished under section 44 of the said Act, for the financial years 2017-18 or 2018-19 or 2019-20 or 2020-21 or 2021-22 or 2022-23, which is more than the late fee payable under section 47 of the said Act up to the date of furnishing of FORM GSTR-9 for the said financial year, for the class of registered persons, who were required to furnish reconciliation statement in FORM GSTR-9C along with the annual return in FORM GSTR-9 for the said financial year but failed to furnish the same along with the said return in FORM GSTR-9, and furnish the said statement in FORM GSTR-9C, subsequently on or before the 31st March, 2025:
Provided that no refund of the late fee already paid in respect of delayed furnishing of FORM GSTR-9C for the said financial years shall be available.
The Hon’ble Madras High Court of Madurai Bench in the case of M/s Modern India Products v. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs House IGST Section & Ors. [Writ Appeal (MD) No. 1559 of 2021 dated February 21, 2025], allowed a refund claim by the assessee of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (“the IGST”) refund for exports that would qualify as zero-rated supply. While Circular No. 37/2018-Customs dated October 09, 2018 (“the Circular”) relied upon by Standing Counsel to state that if duty drawback is claimed, refund of IGST amount cannot be sought. The Court relied on the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court case wherein it was held that the Circular cannot prevail over Rule 96 of the CGST Rules.
Facts:
M/s Modern India Products (“the Petitioner”) is an exporter of goods known as “absorbent gauze roll”. The export was made on September 26, 2017. The goods were valued at Rs.12,72,827/- and the Petitioner paid a sum of Rs.2,54,449/- towards IGST. The Petitioner contends that the exports would come under zero-rated supply, and they are entitled to a refund of the IGST amount in terms of Sections 16 and 54 of the IGST Act read with Rule 96 of CGST Rules. When the Petitioner applied for a refund, it was not acted upon. Hence the Petitioner filed W.P. (MD) No.9796 of 2020. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single bench on April 17, 2021. Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the present intra-court appeal has been filed by the Petitioner.
Issue:
Whether refund of IGST can be sought if a duty drawback is claimed?
Held: