Legal Chronicle

August 2025

Index

Consumer Forums: File & Win Health Insurance Disputes

1	Introduction
2	Overview of Health Insurance Claims Process
3	Common Issues in Health Insurance Claims
4	Legal Framework Governing Health Insurance Claims in India
5	Forums & Remedies Available for Consumers
6	Legal Precedents
7	Conclusion
8	Disclaimer
9	About Us
10	Our Team

Dear Reader,

The Legal Department at UJA is delighted to impart certain legal knowledge as construed under the Legal Chronicle to keep the readers aware of the recent updates and developments that revolve around various aspects of the law. Our goal is to enable our readers to develop a sense of familiarity with the complexities of Indian as well as international law.

In this edition of Legal Chronicle, we present an insightful overview of the legal landscape governing Health Insurance Claims in India, a subject of significant practical relevance for both policyholders and insurers. With the growing reliance on health insurance to manage unforeseen medical expenses, it is crucial to understand the claims process, identify common challenges and be aware of the legal rights and remedies available in case of disputes. This article explores the health insurance claims procedure, examines the statutory and regulatory framework and highlights the forums available to consumers for grievance redressal. It also discusses notable legal precedents that have shaped the interpretation and enforcement of consumer rights in the insurance sector.

We hope that this edition creates a sense of enthusiasm for our readers and successfully delivers the plethora of legal knowledge as intended. In case you have any feedback or need us to include any information to make this issue more informative, please feel free to write to us at legal@uja.in.

Introduction

Health insurance has become an essential safeguard for individuals and families in India, offering financial protection against rising medical costs and unforeseen health emergencies. However, in recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in disputes between policyholders and insurers, often arising from policy exclusions and rejection of claims due to alleged non-disclosure of pre-existing diseases or ambiguities in policy terms. These issues not only delay the settlement process but also cause significant distress to consumers at a time when they most need support. In this context, understanding the consumer forums and legal remedies available becomes crucial, enabling policyholders to assert their rights and seek fair resolution of health insurance claim disputes. To provide a holistic perspective, this article also highlights significant legal precedents that illustrate the current judicial approach to insurance disputes in India, thereby offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of consumer protection in the insurance sector.

Overview of Health Insurance Claims Process

The health insurance claims process in India generally follows two primary routes, which are cashless claims and reimbursement claims. In a cashless claim, the insured receives treatment at a network hospital and the insurer directly settles the eligible expenses with the hospital, subject to policy terms. In a reimbursement claim, the insured first pays the hospital bills and later seeks repayment from the insurer by submitting the necessary documents. In both cases, the process typically begins with intimation to the insurer or the Third-Party Administrator (TPA) as soon as hospitalization is planned or occurs. This is followed by the submission of required documents such as medical reports, bills, discharge summaries and claim forms. The insurer then assesses the claim against the policy’s coverage, exclusions and conditions before making a decision on approval, partial settlement or rejection.

Common Issues in Health Insurance Claims

Despite the protection health insurance promises, policyholders often face hurdles during the claims process. Common issues include outright claim rejections on grounds such as alleged non-disclosure of pre-existing diseases or the application of specific policy exclusions. Delays in submitting required documents can also lead to denial of claims, while disputes frequently arise over whether a hospital qualifies for cashless treatment under the insurer’s network. Even when claims are approved, policyholders may encounter partial settlements that fall short of covering actual expenses or experience prolonged delays in payment, causing financial strain during already challenging times.

Legal Framework Governing Health Insurance Claims in India

The Insurance Act, 1938
This is the principal legislation regulating the insurance business in India. It provides the legal framework for registration, operations, supervision and control of insurers, while safeguarding the interests of policyholders. Initially applicable to both life and non-life insurance, the Act has evolved over time to reflect changing market dynamics and to incorporate global best practices.
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) issues detailed regulations governing the design, issuance and servicing of health insurance policies. These regulations cover areas such as claim processing timelines, grievance redressal procedures and standardisation of exclusions. They require insurers to process claims promptly, provide clear policy wording, and maintain a robust internal grievance mechanism.
Indian Contract Act, 1872
Insurance contracts in India are special contracts governed by the general principles of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, along with the specific provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 and IRDAI regulations. A defining feature is the complete disclosure of all material facts by both parties, without any misrepresentation or concealment, making the contract voidable.
Consumer Protection Act, 2019
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 empowers policyholders to seek redressal for deficiency in service, unfair trade practices and denial of legitimate claims. Health insurance disputes can be taken to the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions at the District, State or National level, depending on the claim value. The Act provides for compensation, interest and litigation costs, ensuring that consumers have an accessible legal avenue to challenge unjust claim rejections or delays.

Forums & Remedies Available for Consumers

Internal Grievance Redressal by Insurer
The first step for a consumer facing issues with a health insurance claim is to approach the insurer’s internal grievance redressal cell. As per IRDAI regulations Section 15 (3), insurers are required to acknowledge and respond to grievances within a stipulated timeline, usually 15 days. This process is designed to offer a quick resolution without the need for external intervention, and the complaint can be lodged through email, customer care, or an online grievance portal provided by the insurer.

Insurance Ombudsman
Under the Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 (amended in 2021), policyholders in India have access to a dedicated, statutory forum for resolving insurance-related grievances in a fair, cost-free and time-bound manner. The Insurance Ombudsman mechanism is applicable to all life, general and health insurers and covers complaints such as claim repudiation or delay, disputes over premiums, misrepresentation of policy terms, non-issuance of documents and policy servicing issues. Individual policyholders or their legal heirs/nominees can approach the Ombudsman within its territorial jurisdiction if the disputed claim amount does not exceed ₹30 lakh.

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions
Consumers also have the option to approach the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The jurisdiction depends on the value of the claim: the District Commission handles claims up to ₹50 lakh, the State Commission covers claims from ₹50 lakh to ₹2 crore and the National Commission hears claims exceeding ₹2 crore. These forums follow a formal procedure, with specific timelines for filing complaints (generally two years from the date of the cause of action) and have a structured appeal mechanism to higher forums if the consumer is dissatisfied with the decision.

Civil Courts / Arbitration
In certain cases, consumers may opt to approach civil courts or seek arbitration, depending on the terms of the insurance contract. However, if the policy includes an arbitration clause or specifically bars court jurisdiction, the dispute must be resolved through the stipulated alternative dispute resolution mechanism. This route is generally chosen for complex cases or where specialized adjudication is necessary.

Compensation for Loss or Injury:
Recognized under Section 39(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the district commission can award monetary compensation for any loss or injury suffered by the consumer due to the insurer’s deficiency in service.

Providing Adequate Costs:
Under Section 39(1)(m) of the Consumer Protection Act, the district commission can order reimbursement of the actual costs incurred by the complainant during the legal proceedings.

Legal Precedents

In the case of Trilok Singh v. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. (2023, Supreme Court)
Appellant(S): Trilok Singh
Respondent(S): Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
Facts:
The appellant had comprehensively insured his vehicle, which was subsequently stolen. He promptly reported the incident to the police the following day, resulting in the registration of an FIR. Thereafter, he submitted his insurance claim and the police investigation later confirmed that the vehicle was irretrievable. Despite this, the insurer repudiated the claim, alleging a breach of policy conditions requiring immediate written notice to the insurer and adherence to all contractual obligations.
Judgment:
It observed that although the insurance claim was filed five months later, the insurer had not disputed its genuineness. Given that the FIR was lodged immediately and the investigation confirmed non-recovery of the vehicle, the repudiation of the claim was deemed unjustified. Emphasising that genuine claims should not be rejected on hyper-technical grounds where there is full cooperation with law enforcement, the Court set aside the orders of the State Commission and the NCDRC, restored the District Forum’s order and directed the insurer to pay ₹5,50,000 with 9% interest per annum from the date of claim until realisation.
Takeaway:
This case underscores that in insurance claims involving theft, prompt intimation to the police and active cooperation with the investigation hold substantial weight in determining the validity of the claim. The Supreme Court reaffirmed that procedural delays in notifying the insurer should not override the substantive merit of a genuine claim, particularly where there is no dispute regarding its authenticity. It serves as a reminder that insurers must adopt a fair and reasonable approach, avoiding rejection of claims on rigid technicalities when the policyholder has acted in good faith and fulfilled the essential purpose of the policy, ensuring timely law enforcement intervention and verification of the loss.

Conclusion

In conclusion, health insurance serves as a critical financial shield, yet the increasing volume of disputes underscores the need for greater transparency, fair practices and timely claim settlements by insurers. By understanding the legal framework, available consumer forums and remedies, policyholders can better protect their interests and navigate disputes more effectively. The legal precedents discussed demonstrate that Indian courts have consistently upheld the principles of fairness and consumer protection, discouraging the repudiation of genuine claims on technical grounds. As the insurance sector continues to evolve, an informed and proactive approach, combined with judicial oversight, remains essential to ensuring that the core purpose of health insurance, i.e., providing timely and reliable financial support during medical emergencies, is fulfilled.

Disclaimer

This document is intended to provide general information and is not intended to be substituted for any legal or professional advice. This document is meant exclusively for informational purposes and not for advertising or solicitation. UJA has made significant efforts to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate and reliable. However, the information herein is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind. UJA hereby disclaims all responsibility and liability, whether stated or implied, for the accuracy, validity, adequacy, reliability or completeness of any information provided under this document. In no event shall UJA be held liable for any losses or damages whatsoever incurred as a result of using this document.

About UJA

The UJA’s team specializes in offering a wide range of legal solutions, ensuring comprehensive support for both businesses and individuals.

Our Comprehensive Services Include:

Legal Advisory
Contract Negotiation & Management
Financial & Legal Due Diligence
Immigration-related Services
Drafting & reviewing of legal documents, policies & Notices
Labour Law
Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
Business & Operational Restructuring for M&A
Trademark Filing & IP-related advisory
Legal Metrology & Related Services

UJA supports businesses in navigating complex regulations, global markets, and GI laws. Operating across France, Germany, Japan, Spain, and more, we specialize in market entry, expansion, and offering tailored solutions for growth. With over 29 years of experience and a team of 170+ experts, we have helped more than 1000 clients from SMEs to MNCs achieve their goals. Headquartered in Pune, we have offices across India – Bengaluru, Gurugram, Mumbai and International Offices in Japan, Italy and France with the representation in Germany, Spain & the UAE.