India | Japan | Italy | Spain | France | German | UAE
Dear Reader,
The Legal Department at UJA is pleased to present this edition of Legal Chronicle, aimed at keeping readers informed about recent legal developments, with a particular focus on the impact of geopolitical conflicts on contemporary legal frameworks. In this edition, Legal Chronicle examines the evolving scope of force majeure in light of geopolitical disruptions, with a focus on the Hormuz Blockade and its implications for contractual obligations and global commerce.
We hope that this edition creates a sense of enthusiasm for our readers and successfully delivers the plethora of legal knowledge as intended. In case you have any feedback or need us to include any information to make this issue more informative, please feel free to write to us at legal@uja.in.
Global commerce increasingly depends on complex international supply chains and maritime trade routes. However, geopolitical conflicts can rapidly disrupt these systems. One of the most significant contemporary examples is the 2026 blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital maritime chokepoint linking the Persian Gulf with the global market. The disruption triggered widespread invocation of force majeure clauses across energy and shipping contracts.
Force majeure provisions allow contracting parties to suspend or delay contractual obligations when extraordinary events beyond their control make performance impossible. The Hormuz crisis illustrates how geopolitical conflict can transform regional disputes into global legal and economic challenges.
In the Indian context, force majeure is not specifically defined under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but it is recognized through contractual provisions. It is governed by Section 32 (contingent contracts) when expressly included in an agreement, and by Section 56 (doctrine of frustration) in its absence. The primary aim of such a clause is to ensure fairness by protecting parties from liability arising out of events beyond their control and by allocating risk in advance. Its implications include suspension or extension of obligations, exemption from damages, or termination of the contract where performance becomes impossible. Indian courts apply this principle strictly, requiring clear proof that performance was genuinely impossible and not merely difficult or commercially unviable.
Force majeure, in general, is a contractual mechanism that allocates risk when unforeseen events prevent the fulfillment of contractual obligations, such as natural disasters, wars, government actions or other extraordinary circumstances.
Legally, it involves three key elements:
When these conditions are met, contractual obligations may be suspended or terminated without liability. However, the clause is triggered only when performance is directly hindered, not when it becomes more burdensome or costly. The affected party is also required to take reasonable steps to mitigate the impact and resume performance when possible, making the relief conditional and dependent on the actual effect of the event on contractual duties.
Modern supply chains rely heavily on stable transportation corridors, energy infrastructure and predictable trade conditions. However, geopolitical tensions increasingly threaten these networks. Military conflict, sanctions regimes and territorial disputes can disrupt shipping lanes, financial transactions and commodity flows.
Energy markets are particularly sensitive to such disruptions because oil and natural gas supplies are geographically concentrated. Consequently, when geopolitical conflict affects a critical maritime corridor, the economic consequences can be global.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most strategically important maritime passages in the world. It serves as the primary export route for oil and natural gas from Gulf producers, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Approximately 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments pass through the strait, making it a crucial artery for global energy markets.
Because there are few alternative routes for Gulf energy exports, any disruption to shipping through the strait can have immediate global economic consequences.
Tensions in the region escalated dramatically in early 2026 following military confrontations involving Iran and Western forces. Within days, commercial shipping through the strait declined sharply due to missile attacks, drone strikes and direct threats to vessels.
Reports indicated:
The disruption triggered widespread invocation of force majeure clauses across the global energy and shipping sectors.
Several developments illustrate the scale of the response:
These declarations allowed companies to temporarily suspend contractual obligations without breaching supply agreements.
To address LNG and gas supply disruptions, India issued the Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026 under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. It prioritizes gas allocation to households, CNG, fertilizers and critical industries, mandates reporting of supply and usage and overrides conflicting contracts to ensure energy security amid global supply disruptions. The order also empowers authorities to manage shortfalls, prevent hoarding and stabilize domestic prices, providing a legal framework for coordinated responses to international supply shocks. This measure strengthens India’s resilience to external disruptions and supports the uninterrupted operation of essential services and industries.
The Hormuz crisis highlights several legal challenges associated with force majeure in modern contracts:
Force majeure clauses vary widely across contracts. Some explicitly include war or geopolitical conflict, while others require strict proof that performance has become impossible rather than merely difficult.
Companies must demonstrate that the event directly prevented performance. For example, if alternative transportation routes exist, force majeure claims may be contested.
Contracts typically require prompt notification and evidence supporting the claim of force majeure.
Disputes may arise over which party bears the financial burden of disrupted shipments or delayed deliveries.
The blockade triggered immediate global market reactions:
Because the Strait handles a significant share of global energy exports, even short disruptions can trigger significant volatility in commodity markets.
The Hormuz crisis offers several important lessons:
Countries dependent on Gulf energy exports or imports must develop alternative pipelines, shipping routes, or reserves.
Companies should review force majeure clauses to ensure they adequately address geopolitical risks.
Governments must maintain emergency reserves to mitigate supply disruptions.
International naval cooperation may be necessary to protect key maritime chokepoints.
Geopolitical conflicts are likely to remain a persistent threat to global trade networks. Strategic chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal, and the Bab el‑Mandeb Strait will continue to play a critical role in global supply chains.
Legal frameworks governing force majeure will therefore become increasingly important as businesses seek to manage uncertainty in international trade.
The Hormuz blockade demonstrates how geopolitical conflict can rapidly disrupt global commerce and trigger widespread invocation of force majeure clauses. While these provisions provide essential legal protection, they also expose the fragility of global supply chains dependent on narrow maritime chokepoints.
In an era of increasing geopolitical tensions, governments and corporations must integrate legal preparedness, strategic planning and supply chain diversification to manage future disruptions effectively.
This document is intended to provide general information and is not intended to be substituted for any legal or professional advice. This document is meant exclusively for informational purposes and not for advertising or solicitation. UJA has made significant efforts to ensure that the information contained in this document is accurate and reliable. However, the information herein is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind. UJA hereby disclaims all responsibility and liability, whether stated or implied, for the accuracy, validity, adequacy, reliability or completeness of any information provided under this document. In no event shall UJA be held liable for any losses or damages whatsoever incurred as a result of using this document.
The UJA’s team specializes in offering a wide range of legal solutions, ensuring comprehensive support for both businesses and individuals.
Our Comprehensive Services Include:
UJA supports businesses in navigating complex regulations, global markets, and GI laws. Operating across France, Germany, Japan, Spain, and more, we specialize in market entry, expansion, and offering tailored solutions for growth. With over 29 years of experience and a team of 170+ experts, we have helped more than 1000 clients from SMEs to MNCs achieve their goals. Headquartered in Pune, we have offices across India – Bengaluru, Gurugram, Mumbai and International Offices in Japan, Italy and France with the representation in Germany, Spain & the UAE.
Business Standard – “What is Force Majeure and Why Are Energy Firms Invoking It?”
ChemAnalyst – “Kuwait Invokes Force Majeure as Iran Conflict Disrupts Strait of Hormuz.”
Financial Express – “MRPL Declares Force Majeure on Gasoline Exports.”
Reuters – “Gulf Shipping Crisis Deepens as Tankers Stranded.”
Reuters – “ADNOC Adjusts Oil Production Amid Hormuz Disruptions.”
Reuters – “Qatar Declares Force Majeure on LNG Shipments.”
Times of India – “Force majeure explained amid Middle East conflict.”