Read Time: 3 min

Transfer Pricing

September 2025

Transfer Pricing Adjustments in India

How to Handle Transfer Pricing Adjustments During Tax Assessments?

Introduction

Transfer Pricing (TP) remains one of the most contentious areas during income tax assessments, especially for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) with cross-border related party transactions. TP adjustments – proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) or Assessing Officer (AO) – can result in significant tax and penalty implications.
This article outlines a step-by-step approach for handling TP adjustments effectively during tax assessments in India.

Understanding TP Adjustments

A TP adjustment typically arises when the tax authorities determine that the price charged or paid in an international transaction does not adhere to the Arm’s Length Principle (ALP).
Common triggers for adjustments include:

  • Selection of inappropriate comparables
  • Differences in functional profile (FAR analysis)
  • Disallowance of certain expenses (e.g., royalty, management fees)
  • Incorrect Profit Level Indicator (PLI) application
  • Re-characterisation of transactions

Steps to Handle TP Adjustments During Assessments

Step 1: Prepare in Advance – TP Documentation

  • Maintain detailed contemporaneous documentation as per Rule 10D of the Income-tax Rules.
  • Ensure the documentation addresses functional analysis, justification of method selection and explanation of the commercial rationale for transactions.
  • Keep backup evidence like agreements, invoices, emails and cost allocation workings.
  • If possible, perform year-end true-up/true-down adjustments in books to align with ALP.

Step 2: Analyse the Draft TP Order

When the TPO issues a Draft Order or Show Cause Notice:

  • Carefully examine the basis of comparables selected/rejected by the TPO.
  • Identify factual inaccuracies (e.g., wrong turnover filters, incorrect margins).
  • Check whether the TPO followed the same year data and applied multiple year data appropriately.
  • Compare the TPO’s FAR profile with your own analysis—differences here often form the basis for rebuttal.

Step 3: File Effective Objections Before the DRP/CIT(A)

  • If the adjustment is reflected in a draft assessment order, approach the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) within 30 days or directly to CIT(A) in other cases.
  • Draft objections should be fact-based and supported with legal precedents.
  • Highlight:
    • Incorrect selection/rejection of comparables
    • Non-consideration of adjustments (e.g., working capital, risk, capacity utilisation)
    • Errors in the computation of margins or PLI

Step 4: Use Judicial Precedents and OECD Guidance

  • Quote relevant ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court rulings supporting your case.
  • Refer to OECD TP Guidelines and Indian safe harbour rules where applicable.
  • Cite rulings that deal with specific issues like royalty payments, management fees, cost-plus mark-ups or intra-group services.

Step 5: Explore Alternate Resolution Mechanisms

  • Consider an APA (Advance Pricing Agreement) for future years to avoid repeated disputes.
  • Explore Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under applicable tax treaties for relief from double taxation.

Step 6: Keep Communication Professional and Transparent

  • Maintain a cooperative approach with the AO/TPO but assert your legal rights.
  • Respond within timelines and keep detailed records of submissions and hearings.
  • Avoid incomplete or vague explanations—clarity and evidence are your strongest defence.

Step 7: Post-Assessment Actions

  • If an adverse final order is passed, evaluate the cost-benefit of filing an appeal before ITAT.
  • Check if any penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) or Section 270A has been issued prepare reasonable cause explanations to avoid penalties.
  • Assess the impact on MAT (Minimum Alternate Tax) and deferred tax accounting.

Key Practical Tips

  • Consistency:
    Maintain consistent positions year-on-year unless there’s a change in facts.
  • Economic Adjustments:
    Always quantify and justify adjustments like working capital or risk differences.
  • Industry Benchmarking:
    Use industry reports and market data to strengthen comparables selection.
  • Early Warning:
    Identify TP risks during statutory audits to pre-empt adjustments. 

Conclusion

Handling TP adjustments during tax assessments is a blend of technical analysis, documentation and strategic representation. With proactive preparation, strong evidence and a clear dispute resolution strategy, taxpayers can significantly reduce the likelihood of adverse adjustments and penalties.

In an increasingly aggressive TP enforcement environment, the best defence is a robust TP compliance framework backed by sound legal and economic reasoning.